M.V.Ruparelia, A503 Rashmi Utsav, Near Jangid Estate &
Vijay Park, Mira Road (East)
Dist. Thane. 401107.
M. 09821732855. E/Mail: mvrup@yahoo.co.in
To
23-9-12.
Shri Vinay Mittal,
Chairman, Railway Board, Rail
Bhawan, New Delhi- 110001.
Dear Sir,
Sub: Implementation of Various
Policies of Government of India by Rail Ministry on Welfare of Senior Citizens
and Retired Railway Employees.
1.
With the tremendous
progress of Medical Science and general prosperity of the Country, longevity of
citizens in India has increased considerably and our Country is the Second
Biggest Country of the World having huge population of Senior Citizens. Keeping
in view the international efforts and directives of United Nations
Organization, Government of India notified National Policy on Older Persons
with approval of Cabinet on 13-2-99 with clear directives to each Stake Holder
to implement various provisions by fixing targets etc. Government also directed to treat the Older Persons as
respected Citizens requiring strengthening of their legitimate place in the
Society and to take all actions to help them to live their last phase of life
with Purpose, Dignity and Peace. Article 41 of Constitution of India directs to
make effective provision for securing the
right to Public Assistance in cases of old age. The right to equality is a
Constitutional fundamental right of Elders also.
2.
We have been
requesting Rail Ministry to examine certain specific provisions of the Policy,
99 and issue instructions to all Railways for implementation since 10-1-08
through representations by name to Hon. Railway Minister followed by reminders,
RTI Applications, Appeals etc, as indicated in Annexure A. It is observed that
instead of examining and taking decision at Board`s level, letters to Minister
are forwarded to one (Central Railway) or all Railways and even after that
Railway and majority of all Railways having said that these are policy matters
and require to be decided by Board, no action is taken to examine and decide
the issues by concerned Directorates. When matter is taken up through RTI for
giving replies to representations to Hon. Minister, instead of giving parawise
reply for various issues, stock reply is
given that information asked in RTI Applications is in form of complaint &
request and is not covered under the term ``Information`` under RTI and no
action is taken on representations to Minister. Even Ministry of Personnel,
Pension and Public Grievances has included the following as item 1 of AGENDA ITEM
FOR MEETING OF STANDING COMMITTEE OF VOLUNTARY AGENCIES (SCOVA) to be held this month:
Time bound grievance redressal & real time dissemination of
information are the two main ingredients of
this novel venture for the welfare of pensioners.
It has
been reported that several Ministries especially Railways are not handling he
Grievances with all seriousness which is required in such cases. These are
sometime transmitted to
wrong destinations and are also unilaterally closed on incorrect grounds
without resolving. Similar observations were made by CIC also in some other
cases.
3.
We
shall be obliged, if proper action is taken and system of such loose working is
streamlined and the following three main issues of Senior Citizens are
sympathetically examined and proper instructions issued to all concerned for
implementation.
i)
Decisions
on various provisions of National Policy, 99 as brought out in our 4
representations dt 27-5-09, 15-1-11, 12-8-11 and 12-8-12 (Details in Annexure
A) to Hon Minister followed by very large number of reminders, RTI
Applications, Appeals and more than 51 communications in last 4 years for this
one subject!
ii)
National
Policy for Health Care of Elderly (NPHCE) is issued by Ministry of Health &
Family Welfare in 2010. Our representation dt 19-1-12 to Railway Minister,
followed by reminders, RTI Application & Appeals is not examined and
decisions are not being taken inspite of several Railways having said that
Policy Decisions are to be taken by Board. Training of our Doctors in
Geriatric, Geriatric Wards, Training of Care Givers etc are required to be
provided to retired employees as per this Policy. In some years, number of
retired employees will exceed the serving employees and they are required to be
given facilities, as laid down in NPHCE.
iii)
Our representation
dt 9-10-11 to Hon. Minister followed by reminders, RTI Application & Appeal to provide separate entrance in one
IInd class compartment and some seats in Ist class coaches in Suburban Trains
of Mumbai is not being accepted on the plea
that it will be resented by general public. General Public is vehemently
opposing provision of Ladies Specials, Handicapped Coaches, Facilities and
reservations in recruitment, promotion etc given to Minority Community, SC/ST
and backward Classes, FDI in Retail etc etc but all Ministries are following
the Policy framed by Government. For Senior Citizens also, Government has laid
down a Policy to provide Age-friendly, barrier-free access in buses and bus stations, railways
and railway stations, airports and bus transportation within the airports,
banks, hospitals, parks, places of worship, cinema halls, shopping malls and
other public places that senior citizens and the disabled frequent. This
Policy is required to be accepted and followed inspite of any resentment.
We
shall be thankful, if above issues pertaining to 12 crore Senior Citizens
including Retired Railway Employees are sympathetically considered and
decisions conveyed to concerned offices for sincere implementation.
A
line in reply in terms of Para 66 of Office Manual will be very much
appreciated.
Thanking You,
Yours Sincerely,
(M.V.Ruparelia)
Annexure A showing details of References
made to Ministry of Railways.
1)
Application
dt 10-1-08 under RTI requesting for information about action taken by Ministry
of Railways on various specific provisions of National Policy, 99 for last 9
years followed by Ist Appeal dt 3-4-08, IInd Appeal dt 5-7-08 to CIC. Orders of
CIC under no.4582/IC/A2009 dt 6-10-09 and orders again under no.
CIC/OK/C/2008/00634 dt 19-1-10 to give
information within 15 days also not carried out inspite of 3 reminders dt
29-9-09, 21-10-09 and 8-5-10. Total
communications 8, 4 years, not a single reply!!
2)
Representation
dt 27-5-09 to Minister by name for implementing Policy, 99 with details of
various provisions to be implemented by Railways and some other issues
pertaining to senior Citizens, followed by RTI Application dt 8-7-09,Appeal dt
17-8-09, IInd Appeal dt 29-9-09. Wrongly sent to Central Railway, which replied
that points raised are to be decided by Railway Board. CIC`s Orders no.
CIC/AD/C/2009/001260 dt 31-8-10 followed by my 9 letters dt 21-9-10, 16-11-10,
16-12-10, 1-2-11, 24-3-11, 2-11-11, 9-1-12, 12-5-12, 1-9-12. Total Communications 13-Period 3 years.
Requested information not given till date.
3)
Representation
dt 15-1-11 to Minister by name to make provisions in Budget and for
implementing Policy, 99 with details of various provisions to be implemented by
Railways and some other issues pertaining to senior Citizens, followed by RTI
Application dt 10-3-11,Appeal dt 16-5-11, IInd Appeal dt 2-7-11 followed by
fresh Ist Appeal dt 9-12-11 and fresh IInd Appeal dt 1-2-12. CIC`s Orders no.CIC/AD/C/2011/001317 dt 11-10-11,
followed by reminder dt 14-2-12. This also Wrongly sent to Central Railway, which
replied that points raised are to be decided by Railway Board. Total
Communications 8-Period one and half years. Requested information not given
till date.
4)
Representation
dt 12-8-11 to Prime Minister with copy to Railway Minister for implementation
of Policy,99 and other issues with details of provisions pertaining to
Railways. PMO sent this representation for giving reply to us to Nodal Ministry,
which requested Rail Ministry to give position pertaining to Railways under Secretary, Ministry of Social Justice &
Empowerment, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi`s letter no. 15-39/12/2006-07-AG dt
28-10-11 addressed to Joint Secretary, Public Grievance, Railway Board but requested information not given
inspite of following by RTI Application dt 9-1-12, Ist Appeal dt 20-2-12, IInd
Appeal dt 18-5-12 followed by letters dt 7-7-12, 24-8-12, 31-8-12 and 10-9-12. Total
Communications 9-Period one year. Requested information not given till date.
5)
Representation
dt 9-10-11 to Minister by name for providing separate coach in Mumbai Suburban
trains. Forwarded to Central & Western Railway stating that earmarking of
accommodation is to be done by these Railways and simultaneously giving reply
that any extension in the present allotted hours will result in inconvenience
to other sections of commuters (2011/TG-I/20/37 dt 11-1-12). RTI Application dt
22-11-11, Ist Appeal dt 20-2-12, followed by letters dt 19-5-12, 5-6-12 and
20-9-12. Notings leading to decision of competent authority is requested. Total
Communications 6-Period 11 months. Requested information not given till date.
6)
Representation dt 19-1-12 to Minister by name for
Implementation of National Programme
for Health Care of Elderly (NPHCE) followed by Application dt 2-4-12, Ist
Appeal dt 18-5-12, IInd Appeal dt 18-9-12 and letters dt 2-7-12 & 3-8-12.
Forwarded to all Railways and majority of Railways said this requires to be
decided by Railway Board and 6 Railways including Central & Western have
not yet replied inspite of reminders by Board. Total Communications 6-Period 8 months. Requested information
not given till date.
7)
Representation dt 12-8-12 to Minister by
name for implementing Policy, 99 with details of various provisions to be
implemented by Railways and some other issues pertaining to senior Citizens. No
reply even after 1 month.
No comments:
Post a Comment